![]() It is basically a linguistic agreement or pact that enables a discussion to proceed smoothly without forcing a person to each time state, “This is what I mean by the term ‘education.’” It is essentially is a linguistic shortcut, in which one person’s explanation of the word “education” is called Version 1 a second person’s explanation is Version 2, and the third interpretation is called Version 3. The third type of definition is the stipulativeĪnd its purpose is technical and utilitarian. Programmatic definitions are ultimately short slogans or deeply felt preaching about the way education should be. Sometimes prescriptive definitions are expressed in short, clipped sentences such as Pink Floyd’s “We don’t need no education” or the title of Jonathan Kozol’s description of education as Death at an Early Age (Kozol 1985). A programmaticĭefinition is less preoccupied with what the phenomenon or language of education is and more concerned with promulgating a particular practice of education that is regarded as desirable. ![]() The second type of definition of “education” is the programmatic, which comes to advocate for or prescribe a belief of what education should be or should do. This type of definition claims to describe precisely how the word denoted as “education” is most prominently used. ![]() It is a statement that proposes to denote or explain the nature of the meaning of the word called “education” by using a variety of words to explain either what the phenomenon is or how the term is to be understood. ![]() There are three kinds of definitions of “education” (Scheffler 1960). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |